Question: Explain higher immediacy by contrasting it with the ethical and the
aesthetic.
Higher immediacy or religious faith is the most important
achievement made by
a person because only faith offers an individual to have
a chance to become a
"true self". Self is what is done throughout life which
God judges for
infinity. Consequently, humans have a huge responsibility
because those
decided choices in life constitute the eternal salvation or
damnation. With
the religious faith, the ethical and aesthetic are needed to
form it, that is
why they can not be the same. "Faith itself cannot be
mediated into the
universal, for it would thereby be destroyed." (p.69) To
arrive in the
position of religious faith, the ethical must first be
accepted, and a
commitment must be made to choose the ethical and step away
from the
aesthetic. The ethical, the universal, is what decides what is good
and what
is evil. These traits are not decided upon by society, however.
They are
dependent of God and God decides what is good and evil and His
definition
would outrank any human definition, so humans are constantly in
sin. There
has to be a recognition of a duty to a higher being, not to just
social
norms. For example, in the case of Abraham, his actions could have
been very
irrational and wrong if there was no belief in the religious
faith. It is
something that must be decided on by the individual, to believe
that Abraham
was legitimate in obeying God or not. That is was what must be
decided as a
matter of religious faith. Abraham’s "ethical relation is
reduced to a
relative position contrast with the absolute relation to God."
(p. 69). If
Abraham’s actions were ethically analyzed, it would seem he
hated Isaac
because he killed him. But since faith is not in the ethical,
"by its
paradoxical opposition to his love for God, made his act a
sacrifice." (p71).
Then you have the aesthetic, which is the lowest
immediacy because there is
no order and order is needed for a structured
life. The aesthetic is not a
way to live because there is no conscience, or
moral sense, where you have
that in the ethical and the religious. Living in
the moment is bad, selfish
and egotistic. In the aesthetic, one is always
striving to transform the
boring into something interesting for one’s own
selfish reasons.. In higher
immediacy, you already have the sense of
completeness and are not striving
for self-satisfaction. The aesthetic
avoids commitment and responsibility,
whereas in the religious, you have the
defining commitment and you are
committed to it for life. The part of
aesthetics needed in the religious
stage in the imagination aspect and the
infinite possibilities involved in
the religious stage. This aesthetic stage
fails to acknowledge one’s social
debt and communal existence in the world.
Whereas in the religious, the you
are always looking to God, and doing all
you can to be the best you can and
you pay more attention to the social
debts.