Implications of Omnipotence
The concept of omnipotence seems to
reign prominent among most religions, specifically among their myths
articulating the origin and the inevitable destruction of our universe.
Omnipotence, meaning all-powerful/perfect and predictably all good, produces
many contradictions and questions merely by definition. The prospect of a life
form being omnipotent is impossible. For the omnipotent being would inexorably
be the creator and destroyer of all things; however, a perfect (omnipotent)
being needs not to create anything else, for it is perfectly harmonious in its
state, let alone creating an imperfect universe necessary for destruction.
Every race, culture, and individual for the most part seem to have some
grasp on a deity or deities that omnipotently created everything and
all-lovingly watches over all. Some people will declare these beings’
omnipotence as fact and infallible, but with no deliberation of the entire
scheme of things. Most believers, with some exceptions, say that one must have
faith, and irrelevantly tack-on, “Our god(s) is all-powerful, and loves all
his/their children however imperfect they may be.” If something is perfect and
all- powerful then nothing imperfect can come from it. This also proves that the
concept of opposition would not exist; everything would perpetuate in perfect
harmony. Most monotheistic religions such as Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc.
believe in a single omnipotent god that loves man above all as sons and
daughters. If such a being exists and is truly omnipotent, why is there so much
pain? Man suffers from plague, war, and natural disaster. How does man’s agony
in any way depict an all-knowing and all-loving being? Followers often use the
sayings: “It is his (omnipotent being) will” or “He (omnipotent being) works in
mysterious ways,” in order to justify man’s constant sorrow before this being’s
feet. According to the Bhagavad-Gita (Hindu sacred book), when “all the radiance
of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the silent sky, that would be like
the coming of the Mighty One. I am become death, the shatterer of worlds.” With
the presence of nuclear power, this quote seems somewhat disheartening;
nevertheless it reiterates the fact that if there is a force above all, it being
omnipotent is unfeasible. If a creator/destroyer does exist it cannot be
omnipotent if it must destroy what it created.
Slavery, genocide, manifest
destiny, communism, capitalism, dictators, monarchies, over population, family
structures, and much more all contain frailties that mar man’s well being.
Wouldn’t it be a given for an all-powerful being to omit such creations when it
was originally at the drawing board? If all the pain and imperfections was
created by the same being that twisted everything else together, then it does
not love us, nor is it omnipotent.