|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hand of Hope
|
During the surgery on little Samuel, the little guy reached his tiny but fully developed hand through the incision and firmly grasped the surgeon's finger.
|
| The picture is that of a 21-week-old unborn baby named Samuel Alexander
Armas, who is being operated on by a surgeon named Joseph Bruner. The baby was diagnosed with spina bifida and would not survive if removed from his mother's womb. Little Samuel's mother, Julie Armas, is an obstetrics nurse in Atlanta. She knew of Dr. Bruner's remarkable surgical procedure. Practicing at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, he performs these special operations while the baby is still in the womb. During the procedure, the doctor removes the uterus via C-section and makes a small incision to operate on the baby. During the surgery on little Samuel, the little guy reached his tiny but fully developed, hand through the incision and firmly grasped the surgeon's finger. The photograph captures this amazing event with perfect clarity. The editors titled the picture, "Hand of Hope." The text explaining the picture begins, "The tiny hand of 21-week-old fetus Samuel Alexander Armas emerges from the mother's uterus to grasp the finger of Dr. Joseph Bruner as if thanking the doctor for the gift of life." Little Samuel's mother said they "wept for days" when they saw the picture. |
God made only mankind in his image. We are uniquely singled out bearing the image of God above any other creature. He is the sole object of Christ's redemptive love. Christ went to the trouble of dying for our transgressions against God by becoming a human first. He went through the process of being put in a womb and being there for 9 months like any other, then born under the human conditions (without sin). Certainly The preexistent Son of God was a person, and he was a person in the womb. God said to Noah
"Whoever sheds man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed; for
God made man in his own image." (Gen. 9:6) God points out that
man is unique he is worth more than animals.
|
||||
On September
11th, 2001, Islamic terrorists killed 3000 innocent people
who were peaceably trying to live their lives. On that
same day, 4000 sweet babies just like little Samuel died
from abortion in America. This, all at a time when there are lines of
people, all waiting to adopt these holy innocents.
|
||||
|
|
||||
| Abortion Doctors have murdered over 43 million real people (babies) since 1973 A great many of these infants had their fully developed skulls crushed by so-called "doctors" | ||||
Who in the 1950's or 1960's could have dreamed that the America we love would have made it an undeniable right (Law) that a woman could contract a so-called "doctor" to reach into her uterus with forceps and crush the head of a well-formed thinking and feeling baby, pull apart the baby's limbs with cold steel instruments and burn its small body with saline solution? |
They crush their skulls and pull apart their little bodies, or poison them
|
|
|
|
| This is not a broken doll. This little boy was one of several third trimester BABIES found in medical waste bags outside a legal abortion center in Houston, Texas, in late 1986. He was 14 inches long, weighed 2 pounds 2 ounces, and was 30 weeks gestation....... 7 MONTHS OLD......when he was killed. |
This is a precious 4 1/2 month old little girl, burned by saline
solution a "doctor" used to abort her. There are 4000 babies
aborted each day in America (one every 20 seconds). Abortion is
legal through all nine months of pregnancy. |
This black BABY was aborted on May 11,
1987, at the Michigan Avenue Medical Center in Chicago,
Illinois, by the "D&E" (dilation & evacuation) method. By this
"procedure" the abortionist uses large forceps to crush the baby
inside the mother's uterus and remove it in pieces. |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| 7 June 2005: Such findings are based on data collected and analyzed by Dr. Caroline Moreau of Hospital de Bicetre and her colleagues. As reported by LifeSite.net, the researchers concluded "that women with a history of abortion were 1.5 times more likely to give birth very prematurely (under 33 weeks gestation), and 1.7 times more likely to have a baby born extremely (under 28 weeks gestation) preterm." | ||||||
|
|
||||||
Without abortion, America's African-American population on
41 million people would be about 35% larger today.
John
Kerry argues that an unborn child is not a person, so this
unborn baby is therefore not protected by the law.
Blacks should remember that the Supreme Court used this same
basic flawed argument in 1857 during their "Dred Scott"
decision. The outcome, was that this court declared
that blacks simply weren't persons because they were
inferior; so the law didn't protect them.
|
||||||
Breast cancer
kills more women in the 40 - 59 year age group than just
about anything else. Breast cancer in woman has
dramatically increased right alongside abortion since 1972.
In 1962 there were 63,000 cases. In 1972 that jumped
to 90,000 cases of breast cancer detected. And in 2002
there were an estimated 203,500 cases.
|
||||||
August 2, 2005: Using 1990-2003 data, a Pfizer/National Medical Association study has found. that the breast-cancer death rate for black women was 14 percent higher than for white women in 1990, yet 36 percent higher in 2002. See this real story about a woman dying of Breast Cancer: HERE |
||||||
| ABORTION - and LINK to Breast Cancer
Angela Lanfranchi, M.D. is a breast surgeon in New Jersey. Angela came across the abortion/breast-cancer link in the early 1990's when she noticed that larger numbers of young women were coming into her office with breast cancer - who also had a history with abortion, often in their teens. She wasn't the first to notice this correlation. Angela also noticed that studies showing this correlation were not getting into clinicians' literature. She says it made her mad. She couldn't stand seeing those 30-year olds in the office, with breast cancer with little toddlers. "These children weren't going to have their mothers" she said. Angela said that in 1996 she read a meta-analysis of the relevant studies by a Joel Brind, Ph.D. who was a biology professor at Baruch College in New York, who helped put the pieces together. According to Joel's article the first study that showed a link between breast cancer and abortion was published in 1957 in the prominent English-language Japanese Journal of Cancer Research. In those days, abortion was legal in Japan. At the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Institute in Seattle, cancer researcher Janet Daling and a team of scholars found "[a]mong women who had been pregnant at least once, the breast cancer rate in those who had experienced an induced abortion was 50 percent higher than among other women. Highest risks were observed when the abortion was done at ages younger than 18 years...or at least 30 years of age or older." |
||||||
|
||||||
| Genetic
Technology: Evidence of Murder
By Kelly Hollowell, J.D., Ph.D. Science Ministries - On the dawn of a new era in genetic technology, most people are focusing on the potential benefits of drugs tailor-made for individuals, gene therapy, and predictive testing. Others fear the possible abuses of science and technology, and the creation of a "brave new world." So, as scientists, politicians, and ethicists argue about the technology, where should our focus as Christians lie? First, Christians have the opportunity and obligation to take the lead on the social and legal policies that keep pace with technology. Currently, there are few such policies in place. Getting involved on the ground floor will be key to future decisions that will affect our worldview. Second, if we put our minds to it, understanding the technology might be used to our advantage to undo some current policies not in agreement with Biblical principles. Here is the prime example: Thanks to our understanding of the human genome and cloning technology, Christians can now state with scientific conviction that life begins at conception. Even the secular community agrees. The first page of the New York Times article about the new "gene map" is quoted as saying that, "the human genome is a pearl, a model of high performance and reliability. Millions of times a year, egg genome meets sperm genome and the result is a human baby, its parts all in place, its brains a universe of love and meaning."(1) Combine this understanding with what we know from cloning experiments. Scientific studies have shown that a cloned life cannot become anything but a genetic duplicate of the original, even at its earliest stages. It is set on a predetermined pathway of life from the moment of conception. It cannot have a different eye color. It cannot have a different hair color. It is a carbon copy in every physiological respect. We have only to read between the genetic lines to understand that this means life begins at conception. Now apply this understanding to current abortion policy. In 1973, Justice Harry Blackmun is quoted from Roe v. Wade as saying, "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate."(2) Clearly, today, that is no longer the case. We can now say with scientific certainty when life begins. It only requires getting this information into the hands of committed Christians who will tolerate the abomination of abortion no longer. Proponents of abortion must be made to listen to themselves. At a minimum, they must be forced to acknowledge that if they persist in their policies regarding abortion, then they must own up to murder. No more sugarcoated terms like "viability" and "preembryo" should be permitted. If a child's life has no value as compared to the mother, at least force proponents of abortion to say so. Let's force them to have the intellectual integrity to stand behind their "choice" to kill the child. Let's no longer allow them to hide behind the veil of ignorance and technical terminology. If they must kill, let them be branded as murderers and nothing less. Forcing their hand on this issue will not be easy. It is no small irony that, on the dawn of this new era, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of partial birth abortion. Our work is cut out for us, but God and science are on our side. Let's embrace this cutting edge technology and use it, for once, the way our opponents always do, to our advantage. |
||||||
|
Call or
Visit |
||||||
|
|
||||||
| Care Net's
strategy is simple. They hope and pray women are led to
their local pro-life pregnancy center before they are
deceived into choosing death at an abortion clinic. Care Net also seeks to exalt Jesus Christ and to bring new hope to those who have been led astray. Many women who visit Care Net pregnancy Centers are trapped in destructive lifestyles. Many find themselves pressured by partners, parents and peers to end their pregnancies. And many more have simply fallen for the lie that abortion is their only feasible pregnancy option. The ministry of Care Net is about presenting the Gospel of Jesus and presenting the Gospel of Life. Read the story of Lori.... A young mother who chose life after visiting Care Net's site for women. Single and pregnant, Lori thought that ending her pregnancy was the only way out. She made an appointment for an abortion. But still having questions, Lori logged onto her computer and typed in the word "abortion". That is how Lori found the Care Net website. When Lori called the Care Net Option line 1-800 number, she reached one of their caring consultants and was encouraged to consider positive pregnancy options. Then Lori was connected to her local Care Net pregnancy center. After visiting her local Care Net center and receiving counseling from Christians, Lori chose life for her baby. Lori said; "I am so thankful for my beautiful brown-eyed Emily, and am grateful that I found the website".... |
||||||
|
Visit the Care Net website HERE |
|
See what Our Lady & Jesus at Bayside say about abortion
Please read More at Let Us Reason Ministries
|
|
Birth of an Angel |
Angels Once upon a time there was a child ready to be born. So one day, she asked God:
But,
tell me, here in Heaven, I don't do anything else but sing and smile
- that's enough for me to be happy. And
how am I going to be able to understand when people talk to me, if I
don't know the language men talk? And
what am I going to do when I want to talk to you? I've
heard that on earth there are bad men. Who will protect me? But
I will always be sad because I will not see you anymore. At
that moment, there was much peace in heaven. But voices from
earth could already be heard and the child, in a hurry, asked
softly: Oh,
God, if I'm about to leave now, please tell me my angel's name.
|
|
|
|
|
RU-486 is an abortion cocktail that takes up to 44 days to end unwanted pregnancies and is a back-alley solution in developing countries. |
Strong and reliable evidence exists that this two-drug abortion regimen is far from safe for women! |
In 2005, the FDA admitted to receiving more than 600 reports of serious complications from the use of RU-486. These complications include bacterial infections, bleeding, ruptured ectopic pregnancies, and death. In July 2005, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revealed that five American women had died after using RU-486. |
RECOMMENDED READING
See the lies
Pro-Abortions told to get acceptance of abortion..
by David Kupelian
See at Amazon here
|
|
|
Struggling for Life |
|
How your Tax Dollars and Twisted Science Target the Unborn |
| The most dangerous time in any child's life is his or her first nine months. That's because abortion takes one out of every four children conceived in America, making the route from womb to tomb very short for millions of unborn boys and girls. "Struggling for Life" provides a shocking glimpse into how your tax dollars and twisted biomedical research are targeting the unborn. Written by Dr. Kelly Hollowell, WND contributor and founder of Science Ministries, Inc., this riveting, sometimes personal account details the gushing flow of federal dollars into the coffers of America's leading abortion performer. |
|
$9.00 at WorldNetDaily.com here |
|
|
|
Democrats, Feminists and You... |
This article below is a really good read about the feminist movement and it's hypocritical viewpoints. It is a bit long, but very much worth the time! 7. Commentary by by Don Feder, Posted Mar 07, 2006: http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=13017 Back in the 1980s, when conservative social critics suggested it was better for the mothers of young children to stay home (instead of consigning them to day-care gulags), feminists were furious. "How dare you tell women what to do!" they screeched. "The nerve trying to tell us how to live our lives!" So, guess who's now telling women how to live, and excoriating them for thinking independently? Feminists. Under a veneer of empowerment, the movement has always been fascistic. It's instructive to now see the sisters goose-stepping out of the totalitarian closet, truncheons raised to smash errant skulls. Leading the charge is Linda Hirshman, lawyer, professor and scourge of stay-at-home moms. Recently, ABC's Good Morning America (which my friends at the Media Research Center call "Good Morning Morons") showcased Hirshman's rant on two consecutive shows, in segments titled Mommy Wars: To Work or Stay at Home? and How to Raise Kids: Stay Home or Go to Work? Typical of what passes for balance on the networks, Good Morning America afforded roughly 80% of each segment to Hirshman's views. Dissenters got nodding notice to maintain the pretence of fairness. Hirshman has attained celebrity status by alerting us to the under-reported crisis of our time -- despite decades of feminist indoctrination (delivered from the classroom to entertainment television --where what used to be called housewives are practically nonexistent) -- women are actually choosing to stay at home and nurture their children. Global terrorism, global warming - kids' stuff, by comparison. ABC cited census data showing 54% of mothers with a graduate or professional degree no longer work full- time. This is bolstered by Hirshman's own study of 30 women whose wedding announcements appeared in the New York Times in 2003 and 2004. Only five are now working full-time outside the home. Ten work part time. The rest lead lives unsatisfactory to Hirshman and her allies. Feminists are threatened by this phenomenon. It's ideology -- and not the interests of women, individually or collectively -- that drives them. Hirshman's position: Stay-at-home moms are leading impoverished lives, wasting their educations, short-changing their children (who miss the joys of being raised by total strangers who are paid to care about them) and doing incalculable damage to the cause of women's rights. "I think it's a terrible mistake for these highly educated and capable women to make that choice (choosing children and home over career), Hirshman declares. "I am saying an educated, competent adult'' place is in the office." Yes, I think we got that. The Ms. Magazine Poster Person isn't buying the argument that raising the next generation is in any way, shape or form fulfilling. "I would like to see a description of their daily lives that substantiates that," Hirshman harrumphs. "Their description of their lives does not sound particularly interesting or fulfilling for a complicated person, for a complicated, educated person," she adds. What Hirshman means is: "I don't find their lives particularly interesting or fulfilling -- and my judgment is the measure of all things." And to think, feminists have been accused of elitism. Hirshman belittles those women who believe there's no substitute for mom. She pushes a proposition absurd on its face -- that there is no difference in the "happiness levels" of children consigned to the Joyful Tots Detention Center, versus those raised at home. In the first place, only someone with a PhD. (a complicated, educated idiot) thinks happiness levels can be measured. And what about the disease and abuse (physical and sexual) rampant in day care? How about the fact that children in day care tend to be more aggressive and less socialized that their raised-at-home peers? Have you ever witnessed the heart-rending spectacle of a three-year-old crying and pushing its mother away -- screaming that it wants to be taken to day care? Nor will you. As a counterpoint to Hirshman, Good Morning America presented Debbie Klett, a mother who left a job in ad sales and founded a magazine called Total 180, to spend more time with her kids. Klett: "For me, I feel it is vital to be there for my children every day, to consistently tend to their needs, to grow their self-esteem, and to praise them when they're right, guide them when they're not, and to be a loving, caring mom every minute of the day." Why, the anti-social wretch! To clinch her argument, Hirshman notes the divorce rate is over 40%. These ninnies, says she, they devote themselves to hubby and kinder, then they're cast aside in a divorce and see their standard of living take a nose dive. But it was feminists in the '70s who pushed no-fault divorce, which -- they maintained -- would liberate women from stultifying marriages. Now they're using the divorce rate to scare women into the workforce. Talk about chutzpah. Hirshman has a prescription for the ticking of biological clocks: "Have a baby. (If you must.) Just don't have two," which makes work outside the home difficult. Also, Hirshman advises, find Mr. Mom -- a guy who's into diapers and dirty dishes. "You can either find a spouse with less social power (read: money) than you or find one with an ideological commitment to gender equality (read: gender sameness)." I can just picture the personal ad: "Feminist seeks socially inferior, self-neutered male who believes that men and women are emotionally androgynous. Objective: A matrimonial merger and the production of one child, who will be raised by the proverbial village on The Feminist Mystique and Our Bodies, Our Selves (between viewings of Thelma and Louise and G.I. Jane)." In the '80s, young women had a word for such fine specimens -- "wimp." Linda Hirshman is doing a great service to humanity. She is glaringly obnoxious proof of what conservatives have been saying for decades --feminists hate the family. (Hirshman: "The family -- with its repetitious, socially invisible, physical tasks -- is a necessary part of life, but allows fewer opportunities for full human flourishing than public spheres like the market or government.") In other words, the female insurance executive or the female junior college instructor (lecturing a roomful of bored freshmen in a 101 course) is engaged in stimulating, fulfilling, socially useful activity, while the mother who sees a human being developing on a daily basis, and shapes that life more than anyone else, is a brain-dead drudge and a dupe. Here's the ultimate irony: Feminists are anti-feminine. They reject hearth and home, procreation and childrearing (unless it's done by "professionals"). They deny the maternal instinct. They condemn the feminine urge to nurture and to create a safe haven from the perils of modern life. (They also deny the male imperative to serve and protect.) Everything that's distinctive about their sex, they abhor. Because they hate their nature, they are self- loathing. Most are miserable -- and deservedly so. For almost 20 years, I worked in a newsroom with these resentful, envious, humorless harpies. An uglier lot you will never find -- this side of Alien vs. Predator. Most were deeply unhappy with their lives, always ready to take offense at imaginary slights, convinced that any lack of advancement was due to a chauvinist conspiracy and angry at those who challenged feminist dogma. They were about as much fun as Hillary on a bad hair day (speaking of resentful, envious, humorless harpies). Who in their right mind would take life advice from such spiritually misshapen creatures? ABC News, of course. This article was originally posted at GrasstopsUSA.com. Mr. Feder is a former syndicated columnist for the Boston Herald and author of Who's Afraid of the Religious Right? (Regnery) and A Jewish Conservative Looks at Pagan America. He works as a freelance writer and media consultant and serves as the president of Jews Against Anti-Christian Defamation.
|
Did my Son's message not tug at your heart? Did you ever wonder?
He came down from Heaven and took your sins on Himself!
Don't kill His Children!
|
Other Great Links at Bible Probe
|
Figure the Odds Real Miracles and Angel Visits Real Angel Visit to a Muslim in Iran Read Muhammad, Terrorist of Prophet? The Exodus Happened
|
